Evidence criteria
Independently reviewed for California Tier 1 placement.
CALIFORNIA TK–5 LITERACY
Teaching Lab + Relay’s TK–5 Structured Literacy Professional Learning Program combines sequenced professional learning with job-embedded coaching to help educators strengthen evidence-based literacy instruction across classrooms, schools, and districts.
Districts selecting from California's approved list can choose Teaching Lab + Relay's TK–5 Structured Literacy Professional Learning Program with confidence. The State Board of Education approved it on September 9, 2026, after an independent review against 18 evidence criteria, and it qualifies for state literacy professional development funding.
This is more than a course. The Teaching Lab + Relay model combines sequenced learning with ongoing coaching and implementation support so that new learning becomes sustained classroom and leadership practice.
Build shared understanding of evidence-based literacy practices.
Practice and translate new learning into daily instruction.
Use observation, modeling, feedback, and planning to strengthen implementation.
Use evidence from classrooms and student learning to refine practice.
Build leadership routines and systems that support lasting implementation.
Independently reviewed for California Tier 1 placement.
Approximately 60% of each professional learning session is dedicated to practice, rehearsal, and feedback.
Teachers receive sustained, job-embedded coaching around defined instructional goals.
Teacher, school leader, and district leader coaching reinforce the same literacy priorities.
Professional learning and coaching work together to build knowledge, strengthen instructional practice, and support coherent implementation across schools and systems.
Sequenced, interactive learning that builds shared understanding of evidence-based literacy practices and gives educators meaningful time to apply and reflect on new learning.
→Job-embedded coaching that can include observation, modeling, feedback, co-planning, and analysis of student work to strengthen daily literacy instruction.
→Support for principals and instructional leaders to strengthen walkthroughs, use instructional evidence, set priorities, and build systems that sustain high-quality literacy implementation.
→Support for district teams to align literacy priorities, monitor implementation across schools, and use evidence to differentiate support while maintaining systemwide coherence.
→Teachers and leaders move through the same five modules on parallel tracks. Teachers build the instructional moves, leaders build the systems that sustain them, and everyone shares one language for what strong literacy instruction looks like. Every session is 60 minutes, and about 60% of each one goes to guided practice.
How reading develops, and what instruction every student needs.
Trace how the brain learns to read, name the non-negotiables of evidence-based literacy, and build a shared language for strong HQIM lessons.
Complete a literacy assets-and-needs assessment and set schoolwide goals aligned to California guidance.
Foundational skills for all learners.
Practice explicit phonemic awareness and phonics routines, then use error analysis and quick diagnostic checks to group students and adjust instruction.
Observe for explicit, systematic instruction and make sure Tier 2 and Tier 3 support reinforces core instruction instead of running alongside it.
Making meaning from text.
Teach vocabulary, morphology, and syntax explicitly, and plan integrated and designated ELD moves into daily literacy lessons.
Spot whether language is being taught or assumed, and support scaffolds that keep students in grade-level text.
Using the strengths multilingual learners bring to every part of the literacy block.
Build knowledge through text sets and structured discussion, and teach writing as a core literacy outcome, with strategies for multilingual learners at every proficiency level, including newcomers.
Keep instruction coherent so schools stop choosing between phonics and comprehension, and calibrate feedback to name specific literacy moves.
Catching reading difficulty early, and responding before it takes hold.
Recognize early signs of reading difficulty — including telling language acquisition apart from reading challenges — and use progress monitoring to adjust intervention.
Build a Tier 1–3 plan for protected intervention time, plus a tracking system ready for California's reporting requirements: who was trained, in which program, and where it's being implemented.
Module 5 helps district and school leaders prepare to track who was trained, in which program, and where it is being implemented.
Aligned to the California ELA/ELD Framework, the California Dyslexia Guidelines, and the English Learner Roadmap, and built to work with the instructional materials your district already uses.
Learning happens in monthly sessions and continues in classrooms through coaching, so every hour connects to the instruction happening that week.
| Who | What | How often | Approximate time per year |
|---|---|---|---|
| TK–5 teachers & school leaders | In-person professional learning sessions in grade-level and role-alike groups | Monthly, 60 minutes | ~9–10 hours per cohort |
| TK–5 teachers | One-on-one, in-person coaching: observation, modeling, co-planning, feedback | 6–8 week coaching cycles across the year | ~18–24 hours per teacher |
| Principals, APs & instructional coaches | Individual or small-group coaching on walkthroughs, data, and schoolwide systems | Bi-monthly | ~6–8 hours per leader |
| District leaders | Team coaching on implementation data and system-wide coherence, in person or virtual | Monthly, with more support at launch | ~6–9 hours per leader |
Most districts complete the program in one school year. Districts can also pace the same scope and sequence across multiple years based on readiness.
California's 2025–26 budget appropriated $200 million for evidence-based literacy professional development. Funding is allocated to eligible LEAs from 2026–27 through 2029–30 in an equal amount per full-time-equivalent certificated staff member who teaches TK–5.
Eligible California LEAs receive an allocation based on their number of full-time-equivalent certificated staff who teach TK–5. The funds are set aside specifically for literacy professional development aligned to the State Board's approved criteria.
This program is on the State Board of Education's approved list, which means it has already been reviewed against the state's criteria. LEAs may also select an off-list or locally developed program, but those programs must align to the same State Board-approved criteria.
LEAs report to CDE how many teachers received professional development and which program or programs they used. This program supports that work with participation and implementation tracking, coaching documentation, periodic written summaries, and a final summative report. The leader track also includes a session on building reporting-ready systems for California requirements.
Tell us how many TK–5 teachers you have, and we'll map a program plan to your allocation.
Answer five quick questions to identify the implementation priority that may deserve the most attention in your district and see how Teaching Lab + Relay can support it.
This short pathway looks at professional learning, classroom implementation, instructional leadership, system coherence, and learner needs.
No problem. Your results will remain here on the page.
The program connects evidence-based literacy instruction with California’s instructional context, supporting educators in addressing language development, intervention, instructional materials, and implementation together.
Language development is integrated alongside decoding, comprehension, vocabulary, oral language, and access to grade-level texts.
→Professional learning addresses early intervention, dyslexia, responsive instruction, and the use of evidence to make instructional decisions.
→Learning and coaching help educators apply evidence-based practices through locally adopted high-quality instructional materials.
→The program is designed in alignment with California’s ELA/ELD Framework, Dyslexia Guidelines, English Learner Roadmap, and related literacy guidance.
→Teaching Lab and Relay bring complementary expertise together in one integrated professional learning and coaching model designed to support sustained literacy implementation.
Connected support from professional learning through classroom, school, and district implementation.
Explore the details districts ask most often about approval, funding, fit, and getting started.
Yes. The California State Board of Education approved the Teaching Lab + Relay TK–5 Structured Literacy Professional Learning Program for the state's Literacy Professional Development Programs List on September 9, 2026, after an independent review against 18 evidence criteria.
Yes. California set aside $200 million for evidence-based literacy training for TK–5 teachers, allocated to districts in an equal amount per full-time TK–5 teacher from 2026–27 through 2029–30. Districts can use these funds for programs on the state's approved list without having to self-certify that the program meets the state criteria.
Yes. Districts must report to the California Department of Education how many teachers completed training and which program they used. The program tracks participation throughout, provides progress summaries for leaders and a final summary report, and includes a leader session on building reporting-ready tracking systems.
The program has five modules: an overview of skilled reading; foundational skills (phonemic awareness, phonics, decoding); fluency, language, and comprehension; building knowledge and writing while leveraging the assets of multilingual learners; and early intervention, dyslexia indicators, and MTSS-aligned tiered supports. Teachers and school leaders follow parallel tracks through the same modules.
Yes. The program is grounded in research on how children learn to read, including explicit, systematic instruction in phonological awareness, phonics, decoding, and fluency. It connects those foundational skills to language development, background knowledge, comprehension, and writing, rather than teaching them in isolation.
The program serves TK–5 classroom teachers, school leaders (principals, assistant principals, and instructional coaches), and district leaders. Each group gets its own coaching, so the whole system moves together.
Most districts complete the program in one school year. Teachers attend monthly 60-minute professional learning sessions (about 9–10 hours per year) and receive about 18–24 hours of one-on-one coaching in 6–8 week cycles. School leaders receive about 6–8 hours of coaching per year and district leaders about 6–9 hours.
Professional learning sessions, teacher coaching, and school leader coaching are delivered in person. District leader coaching can be in person or virtual.
Yes. The program is designed to support implementation of each district's locally adopted high-quality instructional materials (HQIM). It doesn't replace your curriculum.
Language development is built into every module, aligned to the California ELA/ELD Framework and the English Learner Roadmap. Teachers learn to integrate designated and integrated ELD into core literacy instruction, and the program treats students' home languages and cultural knowledge as assets.
The program is aligned to the California Dyslexia Guidelines. Teachers learn to recognize early signs of reading difficulty, tell language acquisition apart from reading challenges, and respond with explicit, cumulative intervention. Leaders build coherent Tier 1–3 MTSS systems so intervention reinforces core instruction.
Evaluation follows Guskey's framework for professional learning and looks at educator knowledge, classroom practice, and student learning. Evidence includes pre- and post-module assessments, classroom observations, coaching records, and student data, summarized for leaders during the year and in a final report.
Yes. Most districts complete it in one year, but the same scope and sequence can be paced across multiple years based on district readiness, which fits the state's multi-year funding window.
Cost depends on the number of teachers, schools, and leaders taking part and which coaching components your district chooses. Contact us for a plan and estimate based on your district's TK–5 staffing.
Start with the two-minute "Find your starting point" tool on this page, then talk with our team. District work begins with a Literacy Assets and Needs Assessment to set implementation goals and decide how progress will be measured.
Tell us a little about where you are in your literacy work. We’ll follow up to think through fit, implementation, and next steps with you.
Let’s talk about your priorities, current implementation, and where professional development and coaching could make the greatest difference.